How California’s Prop. 65 changed how (some) products are made

PressPacs

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

“How a Right-to-Know Law Shifts Industry Away from Chemicals of Concern: The Case of California’s Proposition 65”
Environmental Science & Technology 

Have you ever seen a label accompanying a product that says it contains chemicals “known to the State of California” that could cause harm? That’s thanks to a law nicknamed Proposition 65, which gives Californians the right to know whether they might be exposed to certain chemicals. Researchers publishing in ACS’ Environmental Science & Technology show that Proposition 65 has influenced manufacturers, too, by encouraging them to reformulate their products.

A person pulling a bottle of shampoo down from a grocery store shelf.
California’s “Proposition 65” affects many consumer products and has prompted manufacturers to change their formulations in response.
Sergey Ryzhov/Shutterstock.com

In 1986, a ballot measure titled California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act went into effect. Better known to the public as Proposition 65, this right-to-know law requires companies to warn consumers if their products might expose people to chemicals that may cause cancer or developmental or reproductive harm. The law requires the state to maintain a list of such chemicals, which has grown to include more than 900 entries. But beyond requiring companies to issue warnings meant to inform, and potentially influence, consumers, has Proposition 65 changed industry behaviors as well? Jennifer Ohayon and colleagues set out to answer this question.

The researchers interviewed 37 people from some of the largest companies across industries affected by the law, including manufacturers, retailers, consultants and trade association representatives. The interviews revealed that many companies reformulated products to remove any chemical covered by Proposition 65 to avoid warnings and potential lost sales. Because these reformulated products are sold nationwide, companies also avoided having to make California-specific products. In addition, the team found that the law prompted many companies to dig deeper into their supply chains and discover exactly which chemicals were going into their products to avoid potential lawsuits over nondisclosed chemicals. 

However, Proposition 65 still has room for improvement. The list of chemicals covered by the law isn’t exhaustive — notably, many per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are not included — and it takes time to add new ones. As a result, in some cases manufacturers have reformulated a product to remove the Proposition 65 chemicals only to replace them with an unlisted chemical that might also be harmful but doesn’t require a warning. 

In all, the researchers say this study helps provide a behind-the-scenes look at some of the downstream effects of Proposition 65 on several industries. “Our study shows that by increasing businesses' awareness of harmful chemicals in the supply chain, Proposition 65 has caused them to shift away from using toxic substances, and that’s a positive step for public health,” concludes Ohayon.

The authors acknowledge funding from the California Breast Cancer Research Program.

###

The American Chemical Society (ACS) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1876 and chartered by the U.S. Congress. ACS is committed to improving all lives through the transforming power of chemistry. Its mission is to advance scientific knowledge, empower a global community and champion scientific integrity, and its vision is a world built on science. The Society is a global leader in promoting excellence in science education and providing access to chemistry-related information and research through its multiple research solutions, peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences, e-books and weekly news periodical Chemical & Engineering News. ACS journals are among the most cited, most trusted and most read within the scientific literature; however, ACS itself does not conduct chemical research. As a leader in scientific information solutions, its CAS division partners with global innovators to accelerate breakthroughs by curating, connecting and analyzing the world’s scientific knowledge. ACS’ main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.

Registered journalists can subscribe to the ACS journalist news portal on EurekAlert! to access embargoed and public science press releases. For media inquiries, contact newsroom@acs.org.

Note: ACS does not conduct research but publishes and publicizes peer-reviewed scientific studies.

Media Contact

ACS Newsroom
newsroom@acs.org