FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ACS News Service Weekly PressPac: May 24, 2017
What bone proteomics could reveal about the dead
"Intra- and Interskeletal Proteome Variations in Fresh and Buried Bones"
Journal of Proteome Research
Studying bones has helped scientists reconstruct what dinosaurs and other extinct creatures looked like. Taking this further, scientists recently started identifying proteins from bones to glean more information about remains. But one team has found that the reliability of this approach can depend on which bone is analyzed. Additionally, they report in ACS’ Journal of Proteome Research a forensic use for bone proteomics: potentially determining from bone proteins how old someone was when they died.
Coaxing a picture of life from a person’s or animal’s bone proteins has been a tricky proposition. There have been few studies on how the profiles of proteins change as bones grow, whether the protein sets are the same across bones from the same individual, or even whether different parts of the same bone produce similar groups of proteins. At the same time, interest among archeologists, paleontologists and forensic scientists in using bone proteomics for determining species relationships has grown , in addition to improving our understanding of the fossilization process. So Noemi Procopio, Michael Buckley and colleagues set out to explore the types of information that proteins from bony remains might reveal.
To find out, the researchers extracted proteins from either fresh or buried pig bones. Testing revealed that different parts of an individual animal’s skeleton yielded different sets of proteins. As expected, the most reproducible results came from proteins extracted from the midshaft of long bones, such as the tibia, or shin bone, at positions farthest from the growth plates. The study also identified some proteins that either decreased or increased in samples with increasing biological age. The researchers say such information could potentially act as biomarkers for age in human remains, if further studies bear out this finding.
The authors acknowledge funding from the Royal Society (U.K.).
Note: ACS does not conduct research, but publishes and publicizes peer-reviewed scientific studies.